CONTESTED GUARDIANSHIP LAW FIRM, DISPUTES WITH GUARDIAN AD LITEM REPORTS, CONTROVERSIES INVOLVING FIDUCIARY DUTIES, POWER OF ATTORNEYS AND GUARDIANSHIP LITIGATION, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, LAW FIRM WITH MORE THAN FORTY (40) YEARS EXPERIENCE HANDLING A WIDE VARIETY OF GUARDIANSHIP OF THE PERSON, GUARDIANSHIP OF THE ESTATE, GUARDIANSHIP OF MINORS, GUARDIANSHIP OF DISABLED ADULTS, ISSUES INVOLVING GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SECOND OPINION LAW FIRM, MODIFICATION OF GUARDIANSHIP ORDERS, ISSUES WITH TRUST COMPANIES ACTING AS GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE WHILE INDIVIDUALS ARE ACTING AS GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON, DISPUTES WITH CORPORATE FIDUCIARIES. WE WERE INVOLVED IN A GUARDIANSHIP CASE WITH RESPECT TO WHICH A PHYSICIAN’S REPORT WAS SUBMITTED TO SHOW A GUARDIANSHIP WAS REQUIRED. WE SUBPOENAED THE PHYSICIAN’S RECORDS AND WERE ABLE TO DETERMINE THAT THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT EXAMINE THE ALLEGED DISABLED WARD BUT HAD HIS STAFF FILL IN BLANKS ON A FORM FROM A DIFFERENT PATIENT AND THEN THAT FORM WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COURT AS THOUGH THERE HAD ACTUALLY BEEN AN EXAMINATION OF THE ALLEGED DISABLED ADULT. AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM PIATT COUNTY, MONTICELLO, BEMENT AND CERRO GORDO, MENARD COUNTY, ATHENS, PETERSBURG AND GREENVIEW, ADAMS COUNTY, QUINCY AND CAMP POINT, ILLINOIS.

CONTESTED GUARDIANSHIP LAW FIRM, DISPUTES WITH GUARDIAN AD LITEM
REPORTS, CONTROVERSIES INVOLVING FIDUCIARY DUTIES, POWER OF
ATTORNEYS AND GUARDIANSHIP LITIGATION, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR
COUNTY, LAW FIRM WITH MORE THAN FORTY (40) YEARS EXPERIENCE
HANDLING A WIDE VARIETY OF GUARDIANSHIP OF THE PERSON, GUARDIANSHIP
OF THE ESTATE, GUARDIANSHIP OF MINORS, GUARDIANSHIP OF DISABLED
ADULTS, ISSUES INVOLVING GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SECOND OPINION LAW
FIRM, MODIFICATION OF GUARDIANSHIP ORDERS, ISSUES WITH TRUST
COMPANIES ACTING AS GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE WHILE INDIVIDUALS ARE
ACTING AS GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON, DISPUTES WITH CORPORATE
FIDUCIARIES. WE WERE INVOLVED IN A GUARDIANSHIP CASE WITH RESPECT
TO WHICH A PHYSICIAN’S REPORT WAS SUBMITTED TO SHOW A GUARDIANSHIP
WAS REQUIRED. WE SUBPOENAED THE PHYSICIAN’S RECORDS AND WERE ABLE
TO DETERMINE THAT THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT EXAMINE THE ALLEGED
DISABLED WARD BUT HAD HIS STAFF FILL IN BLANKS ON A FORM FROM A
DIFFERENT PATIENT AND THEN THAT FORM WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COURT AS
THOUGH THERE HAD ACTUALLY BEEN AN EXAMINATION OF THE ALLEGED
DISABLED ADULT. AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM PIATT COUNTY,
MONTICELLO, BEMENT AND CERRO GORDO, MENARD COUNTY, ATHENS,
PETERSBURG AND GREENVIEW, ADAMS COUNTY, QUINCY AND CAMP POINT,
ILLINOIS.
We are often hired for representation in regard to guardianship
cases. Sometimes we are filing for guardianship for a client. At
other times we are contesting for a client a guardianship case that
has already been filed. In some situations, client alleges
conflicts or potential conflicts of interest. There are often
disputes between the appropriateness of acting pursuant to a Power
of Attorney or seeking an Order from the Court establishing a
guardianship and appointing a guardian. There has to be an
investigation as to the appropriateness of any guardianship
proceeding and/or Orders entered by the Court. Sometimes it is
appropriate to petition the Court to set aside, amend or modify
Orders that have been entered in a guardianship proceeding for
various reasons. Sometimes circumstances change. In other instances
new information is obtained. In some cases, there are changes in
the position of the parties or the facts and circumstances relating
to the guardianship, the ward and/or any guardians that may have
been appointed.